[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16882973#comment-16882973 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3265: ---------------------------------- Testing JIRA OOZIE-3265 Cleaning local git workspace ---------------------------- {color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color} {color:green}+1 CLEAN{color} {color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color} . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any star imports . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 132 . {color:green}+1{color} the patch adds/modifies 2 testcase(s) {color:green}+1 RAT{color} . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT warnings {color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color} . {color:green}+1{color} Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc warning(s) {color:green}+1 COMPILE{color} . {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles . {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac warnings {color:red}-1{color} There are [6] new bugs found below threshold in total that must be fixed. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [fluent-job/fluent-job-api]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [webapp]. . {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples]. . {color:red}-1{color} There are [6] new bugs found below threshold in [core] that must be fixed, listing only the first [5] ones. . You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones): core/findbugs-new.html . The top [5] most important SpotBugs errors are: . At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 206]: This use of javax/persistence/EntityManager.createQuery(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljavax/persistence/Query; can be vulnerable to SQL/JPQL injection . At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 176]: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 175] . At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 205]: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 199] . This use of javax/persistence/EntityManager.createQuery(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljavax/persistence/Query; can be vulnerable to SQL/JPQL injection: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 206] . At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 111]: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 127] {color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color} . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations . {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files {color:green}+1 TESTS{color} . Tests run: 3169 {color:green}+1 DISTRO{color} . {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch ---------------------------- {color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color} The full output of the test-patch run is available at . https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1173/ > properties RERUN_FAIL_NODES and RERUN_SKIP_NODES should be able to appear > together > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OOZIE-3265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3265 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 5.0.0 > Reporter: TIAN XING > Assignee: Julia Kinga Marton > Priority: Minor > Attachments: OOZIE-3265-004.patch, OOZIE-3265-005.patch, > OOZIE-3265-006.patch, OOZIE-3265-v1.patch, OOZIE-3265-v2.patch, > OOZIE-3265-v3.patch, rerun.patch > > > Currently when you re-run a workflow with property "oozie.wf.rerun.failnodes" > set to true, > you can no longer re-run it again with "oozie.wf.rerun.skip.nodes" property > specified, even if you set "oozie.wf.rerun.failnodes" to false. > This kind of limitation is not reasonable. There is only one case where > "oozie.wf.rerun.failnodes" is true and "oozie.wf.rerun.skip.nodes" is not > null or empty, that should be disallowed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)