[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16981562#comment-16981562
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-3561:
----------------------------------


Testing JIRA OOZIE-3561

Cleaning local git workspace

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any star imports
.    {color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 5 line(s) longer than 132 
characters
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT 
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} Javadoc generation succeeded with the patch
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc 
warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac 
warnings
{color:red}-1{color} There are [4] new bugs found below threshold in total that 
must be fixed.
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in 
[fluent-job/fluent-job-api].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
.    {color:red}-1{color} There are [4] new bugs found below threshold in 
[core] that must be fixed.
.    You can find the SpotBugs diff here (look for the red and orange ones): 
core/findbugs-new.html
.    The most important SpotBugs errors are:
.    At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 206]: This use of 
javax/persistence/EntityManager.createQuery(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljavax/persistence/Query;
 can be vulnerable to SQL/JPQL injection
.    At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 176]: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 175]
.    At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 205]: At BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 199]
.    java/io/File.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)V reads a 
file whose location might be specified by user input: At 
BulkJPAExecutor.java:[line 206]
.    At AuthorizationService.java:[line 189]: At 
AuthorizationService.java:[line 192]
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/git].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
.    {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [webapp].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA 
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 3196
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 
{color:green}+1 MODERNIZER{color}

----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}


The full output of the test-patch run is available at

. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/1251/



> Forkjoin validation is slow when there are many actions in chain
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-3561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3561
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Denes Bodo
>            Assignee: Denes Bodo
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: performance
>         Attachments: OOZIE-3561-002.patch, OOZIE-3561_001.patch
>
>
> In case we have a workflow which has, let's say, 80 actions after each other:
> {{a1 -> a2 -> ... a80}}
> then the validator code "never" finishes.
> Currently the validation (in my understanding) does depth first checks from 
> the start node and runs in time of n! . This is confirmed as when we split 
> this huge workflow into two 40-element workflow then we get 2x ~40!-step in 
> validation instead of ~80! steps.
> Guys, could you please confirm or disprove my theory?
> Thanks



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to