That's a good question. Does anyone know the answer to that? Can any
committer merge a pull request on github, or how does that happen? We'd
like to make sure we can move quickly, so the more people capable of doing
it the better, particularly regarding the website.
On Apr 20, 2016 12:58 PM, "Sam Barrett" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds good. We can start working on the website, and then commit it and
> submit a pull request once we have the address for the website github repo.
> But who merges the pull request on github? Will we be able to do that once
> we're committers?
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, David Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I spoke with our new developers, and they just got subscribed to the
> > mailing list, so I'm re-sending what I sent earlier.  If you already saw
> > this, please ignore:
> >
> >
> > I think first priority is getting the new team promoted to committers,
> and
> > > probably set as initial-commiters so we can utilize the private email
> > list
> > > in the future.  But that can be done by the PMC I think.
> > >
> > > First up for the devs is the website in my opinion, because that will
> > help
> > > us organize better.  I think we should go with the Apache CMS solution
> > > because that will get us up and running quickly, and free us up to do
> > other
> > > tasks.  If anyone disagrees about priority or direction, please chime
> in.
> > >
> > > Information for setting up a podling website is at:
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html
> > >
> > > Regarding podling websites, this guide says:
> > >
> > > Regardless of which tool you use, the web site should be maintained in
> > the
> > >> svn repository, and include the site generation tool as a binary file.
> > This
> > >> simplifies the process of site generation and enables changes to the
> > site
> > >> to be made by any committer. The generated site should also be checked
> > into
> > >> svn. This allows the generated site to be relocated to any part of the
> > >> Apache site after incubation is complete.
> > >
> > > Since the site is independent of the code, it should exist high in the
> > svn
> > >> repository, e.g. parallel to the trunk of the source tree.
> > >
> > >
> > > Previously we were going to make a github repo for the website, commit
> > > there, and then merge that into the apache repo.  Has a github repo
> been
> > > created yet?  If so, what is the URL?  If not, please respond quickly
> so
> > we
> > > can make one.
> > >
> > > Once we have committers, we can commit it - or an existing committer
> can
> > > commit it if they can do so quickly.
> > >
> > > Also, until we have a website, there's some important URLs for the
> > project
> > > that I guess we should just post here for now.  Here's what I know,
> > please
> > > add anything I'm missing.
> > >
> > > *General*
> > > Incubator page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openaz.html
> > > Website: http://openaz.incubator.apache.org/
> > > Project management:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENAZ%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC
> > >
> > > *Source code*
> > > Official Repo:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-openaz.git
> > > Github Repo: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openaz
> > >
> > > *Website*
> > > Official Repo: (same as source code, branching at top level?)
> > > Github Repo: ???
> > >
> > > *Other ASF / Useful Links:*
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html
> > >
> >
> > *Mailing list subscription addresses:*
> >
> > Everyone should subscribe to the dev list and commits list by sending an
> > > email to the following:
> > >
> > > dev-subscribe at openaz.incubator.apache.org
> > > users-subscribe at openaz.incubator.apache.org
> > > commits-subscribe at openaz.incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > > The folks on the initial committers list should also subscribe to the
> > > private list by sending an email to:
> > > private-subscribe at openaz.incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any other thoughts for moving forward?  Let's keep the conversation
> > > rolling!
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to