LGTM, I agree with Xuanwo's solution.

I have carefully read through all the discussions in this thread, and now I 
understand the matter.

Best,
PsiACE

On 2023/11/30 09:56:48 Xuanwo wrote:
> Taking into account feedback from PPMC members, I propose the following: 
> 
> Initiate an invitation to all committers at [email protected] with a three-day 
> response timeout. Committers interested in taking the responsibilities of 
> PPMC members can respond according to their own preference.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, at 16:52, Mingzhuo Yin wrote:
> >> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All 
> >> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
> >> 
> >> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
> >> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
> >
> >
> > I think it’s acceptable to invite all active committers. 
> >
> >>> I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> regarding the 
> >>> proposed consensus and encourage everyone to participate.
> >>> All PPMC members must cast their votes, while committers are welcome to 
> >>> leave comments.
> >> 
> >> I think this could be a good way. Our current discussion has been
> >> going on for a relatively long time.
> >> We may need a clearer context for posting ideas to encourage active
> >> participation from all.
> >
> >
> > I agree with it. Perhaps it would be better to summarize to a clearer 
> > background and start voting. Furthermore, I think it is also important 
> > to listen to committer's thoughts.
> >
> >> I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the
> >> graduation discussion and moving forward tasks.
> >
> > Sorry for late response. I’m a little busy recently.
> >
> >> 2023年11月30日 16:12,tison <[email protected]> 写道:
> >> 
> >>> warm-hearted committer
> >> 
> >> My experience is that PMC members generally take more responsibility
> >> instead of authority on project management.
> >> 
> >> If one submits patches, report issues, or evangelize the project, I'd
> >> regard the people as a committer who commits to evolving the project.
> >> 
> >> Then, if any contributor (no matter whether or not he/she is a
> >> committer already) shows interest in participate in project management
> >> and showing a good understanding, I'll regard them as a PMC member
> >> candidate.
> >> 
> >> Management includes reviewing/replying other's
> >> contributions/questions, and take actions on CVE, release, etc.
> >> 
> >> I have a loose concern that OpenDAL has a much higher bar on PMC
> >> members than committers. If you take a look at the News section in our
> >> status page [1], you will find that we nominate many more committers
> >> than PMC members, while some of them are around for a while also and
> >> even acts as release manager.
> >> 
> >>> Let's seize this opportunity to nominate more PMC members.
> >> 
> >> It's not a goal to "nominate more PMC members", at least not at this
> >> purpose. But we can review the unspoken bar and nominate new PMC
> >> member according to our understanding. If you'd like to nominate
> >> certain people (with their names referred), note that you should start
> >> a new thread in private@.
> >> 
> >> Best,
> >> tison.
> >> 
> >> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/opendal.html
> >> 
> >> Cai Lue <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 15:34写道:
> >>> 
> >>> Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy dealing with my university 
> >>> graduation issues this week.
> >>> 
> >>>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All 
> >>>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
> >>>> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
> >>> 
> >>> It will be acceptable if every warm-hearted committer could be included.
> >>> 
> >>> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on the
> >>>> members of the PMC[1].
> >>>> 
> >>>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All
> >>>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
> >>>> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
> >>>> 
> >>>> And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> tison.
> >>>> 
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616
> >>>>
> 
> -- 
> Xuanwo
> 

Reply via email to