Thank you for your suggestion. For the first point, I will update this in the proposal with an exact goal for each storage system type. For the second point, I assume this cache is shared by all VMs running in the same host OS.
Regarding cloud documents, I think this is a very good suggestion. Yes, I need to create and maintain a cloud document. This is not only easy to browse, but by updating and maintaining this document during the GSoC cycle, it helps us focus on our goals and demonstrate the phased results of development. For now, I will create a Google Docs tomorrow to display the content of the existing proposal. Thanks again for your advice! Manjusaka <[email protected]> 于2024年3月19日周二 17:48写道： > On 2024/3/19 16:58, 余润杰 wrote: > > Hi, Xuanwo and Manjusaka. > > > > I hope this email didn’t bother you! > > > > Applications for GSoC 2024 contributors opened today, and I hope to join > the GSoC project in Apache OpenDAL as a candidate. I have added you to the > list of mentors for the ovfsproject proposal and hope to have the > opportunity to be mentored by you! > > > > /Project Mentors: Xuanwo ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>), > Manjusaka ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>)/ > > > > I have supplemented and modified some of the content based on previous > proposal, mainly including the following points: > > > > 1) Based on the discussion in the previous email, the name of the > project was changed from ovirtiofs to ovfs. > > > > 2) Added explanation of ovfs design philosophy. > > > > 3) Avoid ovfs persisting any metadata. > > > > 4) Added potential application scenarios. > > > > 5) Added project deliverables. > > > > 6) Added Why Me And Why Do I Wish To Take Part In GSoC 2024 section. > > > > I hope to submit the proposal this week. I'd like to know if there are > still areas that need to be revised or discussed before the proposal is > formally submitted. > > > > Have a nice day! > > Hi Runjie > > Glad to hear from you! > > Nice proposal! BTW maybe you can upload the document to a website like > Google Docs, Gist, so other people can preview the docs online(LOL > > Most LGTM about this version proposal, I may have some issues/suggestions > > 1. We can make our target to implement only one service backend for each > category of the service(like S3 for blob, HDFS for file like, KV storage is > not in the plan). This will help us to focus on the function, not the > corner behavior. > It would also can help us to reach the full-fuction tested target(I think > it's important for us) > > 2. About the cache, I would like to ask: Is the cache shared by all the > VM? or each VM would have their own cache > > > Thanks for your nice proposal, have a nice day > > Best > > Manjusaka >
