What would be the name in the case I had two SuperBadBean EJB's in
different packages i.e.
org.packageone.SuperBadBean
org.packagetwo.SuperBadBean
Both of the SuperBadBean EJB's implement the same interfaces.
On 9/13/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently for a bean like this:
>
> @Stateless
> @RemoteHome(MyHome.class)
> @LocalHome(MyLocalHome.class)
> @Local({SomeLocalInterface.class, AnotherLocalInterface.class})
> @Remote({SomeRemoteInterface.class, AnotherRemoteInterface.class})
> public static class SuperbadBean implements SomeLocalInterface,
> AnotherLocalInterface, SomeRemoteInterface, AnotherRemoteInterface {
>
> }
>
> You'd get these JNDI Names:
>
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBean) // for MyHome
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanLocal) // for MyLocalHome
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanBusinessLocal) // for SomeLocalInterface
> and AnotherLocalInterface
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanBusinessRemote) // for
> SomeRemoteInterface and AnotherRemoteInterface
>
> This pattern is completely configurable, but I'm thinking we should
> change the default to use the annotation names (@RemoteHome, @Remote,
> @LocalHome, @Local):
>
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanRemoteHome) // for MyHome
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanLocalHome) // for MyLocalHome
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanLocal) // for SomeLocalInterface and
> AnotherLocalInterface
> INFO - Jndi(name=SuperbadBeanRemote) // for SomeRemoteInterface and
> AnotherRemoteInterface
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
>
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
