On Sep 13, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/13/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The version would be 3.0-beta-1.
Version changed to 3.0-RC1.
Beta is the term most people liked. I looked up Release Candidate
just now to reality check with my gut understanding of it -- maybe
it's better -- but it doesn't seem to fit. Wikipedia's definition of
beta seems to fit well:
A beta version is the first version released outside the
organization or community that develops the software, for the
purpose of evaluation or real-world black/grey-box testing. [1]
I'm not sure whether or not the branch
name should reflect the version. I think it should. Once it passes a
final release vote the branch will be copied over to a tag, doesn't
it?
Right on both counts. We should even tack on "openejb" onto the tag
name just in case we release other things like eclipse plugins or
something.
-David
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_candidate
