Super!!.
Thanks!
On 9/24/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
>
> > Oh,
> >
> > So I can do
> >
> > openejb.jndiname.format=ejb/projectName/{interfaceType.annotationName}
> >
> > Is that right?
>
> Right. Maybe some explicit not of that should go into the doc, so
> people understand not all of the template has to be variables.
>
> Whenever we get the per bean/bean-interface jndi name support those
> will also be templates, just you don't have to actually use any
> variables. But you could.
>
> -David
>
>
> >
> > On 9/24/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 24, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Great, this is the exact idea. And if someone wants a variable
> >>>> they
> >>>> don't want see, we can definitely add it.
> >>> Just a weird thought coming to my mind. Thought that I should submit
> >>> it to the list and see if it goes somewhere.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What if we allow users to set system properties like:
> >>> jndiname.variable1=value1
> >>> jndiname.variable2=value2
> >>> . . . . . . . .
> >>> . . . . . . . .
> >>>
> >>> .... and then we allow them to
> >>>
> >>> openejb.jndiname.format={deploymentId}{variable1}{variable2}
> >>>
> >>> Point is, instead of them asking us to add a variable, we can give
> >>> them the facility where if a system property starts with "jndiname",
> >>> then the stuff after the period i.e. variable1 and variable2 in this
> >>> case can be used as variables in defining their own jndiname. Users
> >>> can define as many variables as they want this way they can
> >>> customize
> >>> jndinames to some extent.
> >>> This thing came up in my mind because some people standardize the
> >>> way
> >>> they give jndi names to their ejb's, but use the project names
> >>> in the
> >>> ejb's jndi name e.g
> >>> ejb/projectName/beanName.
> >>>
> >>> I don't even know if this is doable, but I remember somebody said
> >>> something encouraging about posting half-baked ideas once, so felt
> >>> encouraged to post this on the list ;)
> >>
> >> Anything is doable :)
> >>
> >> You can definitely do that now, just include the project name in the
> >> template. But I can see it being useful if you wanted to be lazy and
> >> not specify a whole template.
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karan Singh Malhi
> >
>
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
