Happy to know that, please let me fix the Embedded Jetty thing, and if I need any help I will ask you for :D, give me a chance to learn :)
On Jan 9, 2008 5:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry already fixed. It was a dependency issue. We were including > the SAAJ 1.1 apis when this code uses 1.3. I removed this when I > trimmed the rest of the CXF dependencies. > > -dain > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > > let me do it for you :D you did a lot already :D let something for > > me to > > learn from :D > > > > On Jan 8, 2008 11:25 PM, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> This is an implementation of the SAAJ SoapFactory class, and these > >> two methods are new in SAAJ 1.3. The weird thing is SAAJ is not in > >> the 1.5 vm, so we must be picking up a SAAJ 1.2 SoapFactory class > >> from the class path when on Java5. > >> > >> I'm going to take a look at the dependencies today and tomorrow, and > >> will remove any old SAAJ api jars. I'll let you know when I'm > >> finished, so you can try again. > >> > >> -dain > >> > >> On Jan 6, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >> > >>> I checked out the latest code from repo and everything went OK - the > >>> encoding problem didn't appear on my windows machine - but while > >>> I am > >>> building the openejb-webservices project I got two compilation > >>> errors in > >>> SoapFactoryImpl.java, because the createFault() and createFault > >>> (String, > >>> QName); are not supported in the SOAPFactory class while I am > >>> building using > >>> Java 5 when I used Java 6 it compiled just OK. > >>> > >>> I think it will not be a problem for the user who is using Java 5 > >>> to run > >>> OpenEJB but now it is a mandatory to compile against Java 6 at > >>> least for > >>> this project. I was thinking in a conditional compilation solution > >>> and found > >>> one using ANT and I am still searching for one using Maven2, so > >>> while > >>> building if we can detect which Java version we use and weh can > >>> conditionaly > >>> compile the former methods. Any thoughts about that, Am I thinking > >>> in the > >>> right direction ? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thanks > >>> - Mohammad Nour > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
