On May 1, 2008, at 10:47 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Looking into Async invocation support (ala EJB 3.1).
Getting something in that supports the non-persistent/non-transacted
approach for local interfaces seems the most doable initially. The
remote aspect seems trickier and likely going to require some JMS
dependencies on the client.
Will post more details as I get them.
Things are in the process of getting ripped up and redone on the 3.1
spec side for Async invocations, so I'm going to shelve my impl work
for the moment. Hopefully we'll have something more stable in the
next public draft so we can pick this up again.
-David
