As far as I know, all votes are welcome. Jean-Louis
Quintin Beukes-2 wrote: > > Just as a note, the problem I mentioned wasn't one of OpenEJB, so it's > not a -1 vote. It was definitely network related - probably the > transparent proxies of my ISP. > > If it counts, here's my vote: +1 > > Quintin Beukes > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jonathan Gallimore > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've run the tests against JDK 1.6.0_16 on Ubuntu 9.04 (x64) and JDK >> 1.6.0_13 on Windows XP. Everything completed successfully for me (I >> didn't >> see the problem Quintin did, but I did have it last time around, where I >> ran >> the script a few times on a couple of machines simultaneously... I >> guessed >> it was some network issue or something at the time). >> >> I've run RAT over the source, and checked the LICENSE/NOTICE files and >> haven't spotted any problems, so it looks good to me. >> >> +1 >> >> Jon >> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Quintin Beukes >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> test:all ran fine here in both JDK1.5.0_17 and JDK1.6.0_11 on Ubuntu >>> 8.04 - Linux quintin-desktop 2.6.24-24-386 #1 Tue Jun 30 19:54:55 UTC >>> 2009 i686 GNU/Linux >>> >>> I also compiled and ran our unit tests against it for all our projects >>> that use 3.1.2, and they ran fine as well. About 150 tests which test >>> remote+local EJBs, multiple persistence units, stateless + singleton >>> beans, security, and a bunch of other stuff. Not all OpenEJBs >>> features, but a fare set of them. >>> >>> So over here it seems good. >>> >>> I did notice a peculiar behavior from the tomcat download server >>> though. It doesn't feed me more than 4.8mb for any download. As soon >>> as it reaches between 4800k and 4900k (not fixed, random) it fails and >>> the download had to stop/resume. So I had to make a script that uses >>> wget to predownload them, else the ant builds kept failing. Nothing >>> bad, just thought I'd share this as it was a pretty fascinating >>> "oddity". >>> >>> Quintin Beukes >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Ok, we have binaries! >>> > >>> > Repo: >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-014 >>> > >>> > Binaries: >>> > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.1.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/stage/3.1.2/> >>> > >>> > Branch (to become a tag): >>> > >>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.1.2/ >>> > >>> > >>> > And so you can test out the binaries, here's an updated ant script as >>> usual: >>> > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/build.xml<http://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/stage/build.xml> >>> > >>> > "ant test:all" >>> > >>> > Things look good on osx so far, haven't tried windoze yet. >>> > >>> > >>> > -David >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--OpenEJB-3.1.2-tp25833260p25860021.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
