On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd like to know if there is a plan to go to EJB 3.1?
...
> Finally, Jacek did some tests and went ahead with OSGI.
> I spent a couple of time pulling some hair out. After some small tests with
> Karaf, i believe we can make it work in an OSGI environment.
> But, i spoke some month ago with Guillaume NODET and another guy from
> servicemix and if we want to make OpenEJB OSGI ready, it seems we will need
> to refactor some pieces of code. Anyway, i'm convince Jacek have a far
> better overview.
>
> I just wanted to point it out in order to check if we can manage OSGI with
> EJB 3.1 tasks.
>
> It's definitely another topic we can discussed by the end of January with a
> beer (and may be more ...) ;-)

Good you've rised it up as with the new year some of us are about to
make  (or have already done) a couple of wishes and have one for
OpenEJB would be beneficial for the project. I did and will surely
spend more time on the project to bring it closer to EJB
3.1-compliancy with (or without) OSGi. OSGi is a very useful
technology, but our main priority should be to implement the most
fancy stuff of EJB3.1 (if not all) first and do OSGi afterwards.
Having them both will make my wish come true, but don't rise the bar
too high. I'd love seeing more contributors from the community working
with us on those specs too.

On the related note, I don't mind pushing 3.1.3 out with the features
already available in the trunk. They're enough for the release. You
fancy putting the hat of a release manager for 3.1.3 on?

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://wszystkojawne.pl
p.s. Szukam speca/firmy od grafiki/CSS/HTML

Reply via email to