Hey Andy, sorry for the very long delay.
Firstly, i believed we could refactor some activemq integration before checking in your patch. But, to be honest, i'm not really happy with that refactoring because it makes things more complicated. So i plan to CI your patch asap (thx again for the good job). If we all agree, i gonna just rename the prefix as proposed by David (amq4factory and amq5factory). But i'd really like to keep backward compatibility. So, can you have a look on how we can still use openejb: prefix? If you have other topics/jira/features you want to work on, feel free to push a post, a jira, a patch ... I'd be more than happy to commit it for you. Help is always welcome. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-OpenEJB-3-1-2-maven-build-broken-due-to-ActiveMQ-dependency-tp1015106p1401324.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
