On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:51 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to experiment with integrating JCDI much deeper into the core code. ... > Reza (Resin guy) and I have chatted about this and share a similar vision for > both the two specs and how to implement them. Who is atop who is almost > irrelevant in the sense that the two models are essentially the same. Both > are proxy based component models with several container features > (interceptors, decorators, etc) interjected on method calls with some > transactional awareness and dependency. >
Am I right that you're interested in pursuing better OpenEJB-Tomcat-OWB integration? Is that what you meant having said "playing with JCDI" and "deeper into the core code" or are you following Resin/Reza's idea to lay one on the other, be it EJB3.1 atop CDI or vice versa? > The biggest difference between them is Sun owns EJB and Redhat owns JCDI. Does it really matter? I've never been involved in such a thinking who owns what, and as a matter of fact I don't like the the proliferation of managed bean-centered specs like JSR-299 (CDI), JSR-330 (DI) and there was something else I don't remember now. When I first touched the specs I could get my head around them and was wondering why there are so many of them. What's your take on it? (asking as you're closer to the sources :)) Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://jaceklaskowski.pl Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 - http://javarsovia.pl
