On Jun 17, 2010, at 4:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Author: djencks > Date: Thu Jun 17 23:14:34 2010 > New Revision: 955781 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=955781&view=rev > Log: > OPENEJB-1298 half of some more case-change renames > > Added: > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/OutboundResourceadapter.java > (contents, props changed) > - copied, changed from r955776, > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/OutboundResourceadapterX.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/Resourceadapter10X.java > (contents, props changed) > - copied, changed from r955776, > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapter10.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceadapterBaseX.java > (contents, props changed) > - copied, changed from r955776, > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapterBase.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceadapterX.java > (contents, props changed) > - copied, changed from r955776, > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapter.java > Removed: > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/OutboundResourceadapterX.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapter.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapter10.java > > openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ResourceAdapterBase.java
Just an FYI, that ResourceAdapter was intentionally renamed from the originally generated Resourceadapter to better follow java code conventions rather than strictly following the xml convention. The rule with the jaxb tree has always been pretty java code wins, odd xml conventions loose. A main reason pay the cost of manually maintaining the JAXB tree rather than regenerating it each time. Another example of where an object was intentionally renamed from their ugly generated version to prettier java versions: managedconnectionfactory-class is ManagedConnectionFactoryClass versus ManagedconnectionfactoryClass -David
