On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> Hey David,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I wondering about the state of OPENEJB-1257
>>>> Is it still needed? If yes, will it be committed ? :)
>>>
>>> Hi Matthias!
>>>
>>> Missed you at JavaOne.  Didn't realize you were heading over till too late. 
>>>  Let me know if you're coming to ApacheCon NA.
>>
>> Nope. No more travel to the US this year :-)
>>
>>>
>>> We had that patch in for a bit then decided to go with a much deeper 
>>> integration.  Now we have OWB working right in the openejb-core code.  The 
>>> integration is still in flux but generally working.
>>>
>>> I haven't tried any JSF/CDI stuff, but you're more than welcome to dig in.  
>>> The more the merrier.  Check out 
>>> openejb3/assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-bundle/.  That's basically 
>>> a Web Profile stack.  There's a TCK setup for it as well.
>>
>>
>> Let me chekc the that one, when back in Germany.
>> Regarding the TCK. Is there some plan to apply for Web Profile
>> certification, within OpenEJB ?
>
> Check out the Tomcat integration.  It's pretty much been web profile for 
> years now.

yeah I know - I really collapsed EAR approach :-)

> Would be nice to get an official nod if we can.

Indeed, that would be sweat!

-Matthias

>
>
> -David
>
>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to