Hi Thiago,

yep some ideas around bean validation integration into the assembler,
normally it uses a single id (not the module id) so you shouldn't have this
kind of error, can you check with your deployment?

About the timer service i think a lot of work is needed and maybe could be
delayed yto a 3.2.1 (it was not the main goal of the 3.2.0)?

- Romain

2011/5/13 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>

> Hi guys,
> The JPA2 support is merged into the 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT, but I am still trying
> to
> solve the timerservice injection and some new openejb-code junit issues and
> tomcat integration.
> The junit tests have been broken since last commits, and tomee it throwing
> "ValidatorFactory already exists for module ..." on a clean install. Ideas?
> :O)
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > yes you set 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT as parent version (check the java-web-api too,
> i
> > don't remember if it was ok) and add <module>deps</module> in the parent
> > pom
> > (or build it manually ;)).
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> > 2011/5/13 peter-long <[email protected]>
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > thank you for the prompt reply
> > >
> > > the pom.xml in the deps directory currently looks like this (namespace
> > > declarations elided):
> > >
> > > <project ...>
> > >  <parent>
> > >    <artifactId>openejb</artifactId>
> > >    <groupId>org.apache.openejb</groupId>
> > >    <version>4.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > >  </parent>
> > >  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
> > >  <artifactId>deps</artifactId>
> > >  <packaging>pom</packaging>
> > >  <name>OpenEJB :: Dependencies</name>
> > >
> > >  <modules>
> > >    <module>javaee-api</module>
> > >    <module>javaee-web-api</module>
> > >  </modules>
> > > </project>
> > >
> > > are you saying that i should change the version tag's text content to
> > > 3.2-SNAPSHOT?
> > >
> > > but i can't see anywhere that i could "activate" it (mainly because i
> can
> > > not see how it is not activated at the moment)!
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Best-version-to-build-with-JPA-2-in-mind-tp3518952p3519877.html
> > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to