i take this action, javaee-api-noweb could maybe be renamed javaee-api-embedded?
- Romain 2011/6/30 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > On Jun 29, 2011, at 6:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > > OK did some small fixes and merge Transaction stuff (root cause from > David's > > changes). > > Also had a look to JIRA and close some of them. > > > > That's definitely an area where we have to focus on because there are a > lot > > of non relevant JIRA and some of them are really old :) > > > > Everything seems to compile on our CI and I deploy snapshots. > > > > There are still 2 pending issues where I'd like to get some feedback. > > > > 1. javaee-api has a version 6.0-SNAPSHOT > > I do not like to release with a SNAPSHOT. > > As it's only a subset of JavaEE 6 api, I propose to change and release > > javaee-api as 6.0-preview (or alpha, beta, ..). > > I see what you mean. We essentially have two jars that together make an > actual 'javaee-api' jar. The two added together make "one" whole > javaee-api jar. > > We're going to have this same problem in trunk if we want to maintain > Tomcat 6 and 5.5 compatibility. Not sure how we want to deal with that. > > We could actually have two jars, one with everything (for use in compiling > and outside tomcat) and one with everything minus the servlet stuff for use > in Tomcat. Since the current solution is a two jar approach, that might be > an alternate two jar approach that could be a little more useful. > Basically: > > - javaee-api.jar (full, nothing excluded) > - javaee-api-noweb.jar (the partial jar we currently have as > javaee-api.jar) > > Not sure if 'javaee-api-noweb' is the best name, but you get the idea. > > > -David > > > > > > > 2. Following transaction changes, we now depend on geronimo transaction > > component 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT > > Can someone release connector and transaction components or do I have to > > revert my changes? > > BTW, this is something users ask ofter so if you could fix it, that's be > > great. > > > > Then, I check commits since latest release (3.1.4 in January) and do not > > noticed big change without JIRAs. > > > > Then I can enter in the whole release process. > > > > Thanks, > > Jean-Louis > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenEJB-3-2-0-release-tp3632295p3632893.html > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
