On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>wrote:

> Neat idea.
>
> I would include the configuration information in the scan.xml so that
> tooling would know the criteria used in the scan and decide whether or not
> to scan for other annotations or inplementations.
>
> I would also put the scan.xml file in some package specific place like
> META-INF/org/apache/xbean/scan.xml.
>

+1 on the idea and the additions on Alan


>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 2:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> > We've chatted occasionally on creating a scanning.xml file where people
> could setup includes and excludes and, overall, optimize classpath scanning.
> >
> > Romain is already busy hacking of course :)  Here's the idea for a
> plugin to effectively do the most expensive part of scanning in advance:
> >
> >    <plugin>
> >      <groupId>org.apache.xbean</groupId>
> >      <artifactId>maven-xbean-finder-plugin</artifactId>
> >      <configuration>
> >        <annotations>
> >          <annotation>javax.ejb.Stateless</annotation>
> >          <annotation>javax.ejb.Stateful</annotation>
> >          <annotation>javax.ejb.Singleton</annotation>
> >          <annotation>javax.annotation.ManagedBean</annotation>
> >        </annotations>
> >        <subclasses>
> >          <subclass>javax.ws.rs.core.Application</subclass>
> >        </subclasses>
> >        <implementations>
> >
>  <implementation>org.apache.openejb.server.ServerService</implementation>
> >        </implementations>
> >      </configuration>
> >    </plugin>
> >
> > With a configuration like the above, the plugin would scan the jar for
> subclasses of javax.ws.rs.core.Application, classes annotated with
> @Stateless, @Singleton, @Stateful and classes that implement ServiceService.
> >
> > The result would be a META-INF/scan.xml class that looks like so:
> >
> >    <scan>
> >      <classes>
> >        <class>org.superbiz.Foo</class>
> >        <class>org.superbiz.Bar</class>
> >        <class>org.superbiz.Baz</class>
> >      </classes>
> >    </scan>
> >
> > And on the TODO list would be future support for <packages>
> >
> >    <scan>
> >      <packages>
> >        <package>org.superbiz.foo</package>
> >        <package>org.superbiz.bar</package>
> >      </packages>
> >    </scan>
> >
> > With the above you could easily create scan.xml file by hand that would
> at least be far faster than scanning an entire jar.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
>
>


-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to