Okay so I might have gotten that wrong. I thought implementing auto refresh later on could mean to use client-side polling or server-side push...
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > but we said we'll not use long polling so it should be fine ;) > > - Romain > > > 2012/5/29 dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> > >> No implementing client-side long polling in JavaScript might be >> causing issues... >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > what do you mean? >> > >> > clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh? >> > >> > - Romain >> > >> > >> > 2012/5/29 dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> >> > >> >> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a >> >> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar >> >> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid >> >> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues... >> >> >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29 >> >> >> >> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that >> hangs >> >> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser >> should >> >> be >> >> > able to handle it. >> >> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load >> the >> >> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new >> interface >> >> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think? >> >> > >> >> >>> Eclipse RAP >> >> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely >> take >> >> a >> >> > look. Thanks! >> >> > >> >> > Thiago. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the >> >> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting >> >> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the >> >> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would >> >> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does >> such >> >> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery... >> >> >> >> >> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse >> perspective/view >> >> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an >> >> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI >> >> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi < >> thi...@veronezi.org> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read >> the >> >> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O) >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating >> in >> >> >> > similar to digg.com? >> >> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have >> experience >> >> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this >> >> feature >> >> >> > available at the server side. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and >> two >> >> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices): >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png >> >> >> > >> >> >> > What you guys think? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks for the feedback! >> >> >> > []s, >> >> >> > Thiago. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh < >> daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to >> >> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log >> >> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer >> where >> >> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi < >> >> thi...@veronezi.org> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Guys, >> >> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new >> webapp. >> >> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one >> >> which >> >> >> will >> >> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and >> the >> >> >> tomee >> >> >> >> > log file. >> >> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it: >> >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > What do you think? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> >> > Thiago. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
