yep if openejb is built -> build tomee etc...
- Romain 2012/6/22 dsh <[email protected]> > What do you mean by "link builds"? Having dependency builds? > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If the reason is just because buildbot is not able to link builds, we > could > > rely more on Jenckins. > > > > > > 2012/6/22 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > >> arquillian-tomee is no more on trunk ;) > >> > >> > >> while we keep a great CI (we have to link builds) +1 > >> > >> - Romain > >> > >> > >> 2012/6/22 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >> > >> > Hi again, > >> > > >> > After digging into the code and discussion with Romain, I'd like to > >> raise a > >> > question. Any feedback is welcome. > >> > We have been adding new modules and new features for months in the > >> project. > >> > > >> > It works great, but the build is heavy and difficult to manage, > >> especially > >> > when the release process starts. Thanks to David's set of tools, > that's > >> > easier, but still an heavy task. > >> > > >> > We have the same versioning and the same life-cycle for all modules > >> whereas > >> > IMHO, some of them could have a different release life-cycle and get > >> > released more frequently. > >> > > >> > For instance, we have: > >> > arquillian > >> > arquillian-tomee > >> > assembly > >> > classes > >> > container > >> > deps > >> > examples > >> > itests > >> > LICENSE > >> > maven > >> > NOTICE > >> > openejb.iml > >> > osgi > >> > osgi-notes.txt > >> > pom.xml > >> > rat.xml > >> > server > >> > src > >> > target > >> > tck > >> > test-output.xml > >> > tomee > >> > utils > >> > > >> > IMHO, we could get out and get different life cycle for: > >> > Arquillian > >> > OSGi > >> > TomEE > >> > Maven > >> > Examples? > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > > >> > Jean-Louis > >> > > >> >
