However, 1.5.0 still shows up as "unreleased" in JIRA, here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE
Who can make this page more accurate now that 1.5.0 is generally available ?



On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>wrote:

> +1 then
> Le 1 oct. 2012 08:30, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > that's why i created x.5.1 :p
> >
> > we have a stupid windows issue and since we can't fix the OS we have to
> > re-release soon.
> >
> > i don't want the same kind of issue as for last release where ejb
> > injections didn't work in jsf managed beans.
> >
> > Branching now is too early and we'll need to merge all fixes (was the
> cause
> > for this release)
> >
> > so just let do a maintenance release soon and then add features (well if
> > some new features are in the release that's not an issue but the main
> > purpose will be the fix even if it is the less important in line number)
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/10/1 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > I would say that 1.5.1 and 4.5.1 are for maintenance (patches mainly
> from
> > > the 4.5.x/1.5.x branches).
> > > If we wanna add new features, the best versioning IMHO is 1.6.0 and
> > 4.6.0.
> > >
> > > JLouis
> > >
> > > 2012/9/30 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > just created next versions in jira project
> > > >
> > > > so we can start hacking on next features ;)
> > > >
> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to