+1 I like both names. But if it helps people to identify the application server I agree on having TomEE as TPL.
[]s, Thiago. On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:36 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:00 AM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 14, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <nour.moham...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 on the renaming based on the discussion we had before >>> >>> But about the purpose/responsibilities of the project won't that contradict >>> w/ Apache Geronimo ? >> >> No. Apache doesn't have the concept of a project or group of people owning >> a space to the exclusion of others. > > Coming back to this (got very saddened and distracted by the Connecticut > news...) > > We can certainly pause and hammer out a different description. It's primary > purpose is not to restrict or obligate, but in more practical terms is really > to let the board know what we do. It's included at the top of each board > report. > > With 100+ projects and growing, we just need to put on a pretend board member > hat and think "what description is going to help me understand the report I'm > about to read." > > We can of course go off and innovate in all sorts of directions. If one of > those directions becomes a major focus of the project and starts to > monopolize the bulk of our reports, we just need to course correct (what > we're doing now) and make sure our project description matches what we > produce and users consume. > > > -David >
