Are they really the same product? I thought each one was a completely redeveloped version, with no SCM relation to the other.
- Brett Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > The SVN triplet usually gets used per product. openejb[0-3] are really > versions of the same product line. Using standard SVN organization: > > openejb/branches/0 > openejb/branches/1 > openejb/branches/2_0 > openejb/branches/3 - new development branch that will eventuall replace > trunk > > openejb/tags/v0_0 > openejb/tags/v0_8_0 > openejb/tags/v0_8_1 > openejb/tags/v0_8_2 > openejb/tags/v0_9_0 > openejb/tags/v0_9_1 > openejb/tags/v0_9_2 > openejb/tags/v2_0_0 > > openejb/trunk -- v2.x > > On 2/1/2006 8:56 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> So talking with Brett on irc -- he did our commit emails (thanks) -- >> and he recommended this scm structure: >> >> openejb0 >> openejb0/branches >> openejb0/tags >> openejb0/trunk >> openejb1 >> openejb1/branches >> openejb1/tags >> openejb1/trunk >> openejb2 >> openejb2/branches >> openejb2/tags >> openejb2/trunk >> openejb3 >> openejb3/branches >> openejb3/tags >> openejb3/trunk >> >> What do you guys think? >> >> -David >> >> On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:28 PM, David Blevins wrote: >> >>> Alright, svn conversion is done. >>> >>> svn co svn+ssh://openejb.org/home/projects/openejb/scm/trunk/ openejb2 >>> http://svn.openejb.codehaus.org >>> >>> Let me know if you have any issues. >>> >>> Commit emails are not working just yet. Is there an expert in the >>> haus? >>> >>> -David >>> > >
