+1 from me too. History is nice but optional - I don't think we really need it.
-Mike On 7/11/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with Craig: I would like it to get set up on the new machine, and I don't care much about the history. On Jul 11, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > So, > > What do you all think? I'm in favor of having it set up again, not > so interested in the history. > > Craig > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm not on this list, so please reply directly - thanks. >> >> OpenJPA currently have a build set up in vmbuild.apache.org. It's >> been down for little bit, but is now back up. >> >> vmbuild is scheduled to be moved to a faster machine, and I intend >> to install a more recent build of Continuum (that supports >> grouping projects and is generally faster, more managable and more >> stable). I'm able to help get it set up as effectively as possible. >> >> There are a lot of failing builds on the machine right now >> (probably unused by the corresponding projects), so I'm cleaning >> house before the move. >> >> Please let me know if: >> [ ] you would like the project set up on the new machine with a >> clean slate >> [ ] you would like the project (and it's build history if >> possible) moved over >> [ ] you are no longer interested in using vmbuild for CI/nightlies/ >> whatever >> >> Thanks! >> - Brett >> > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >
