Hi Kevin,

On Oct 4, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:

Hi,
It seems that the IBM JDK is cloning a Calendar object when performing the
.equals() method.

Why is that?

If I call .equals() on one of our Calendar proxy objects,
the underlying implementation seems to be cloning the object before
determining the equality. While using this cloned object, one of the setter
methods is called.  Since this is a cloned Calendar proxy, we do some
processing to access the associated StateManager.

Seems like the clone should be treated as detached, which implies that we implement our own clone() method, something like: load fields from database; super.clone(); StateManager = null; return;

But, that requires access
to a Broker and there is no Broker instance associated with this cloned
object and we end up throwing an IllegalStateException.  Due to that
exception, the .equals() always returns false.

So, before I start experimenting with various fix strategies, I'm looking
for some guidance from the original developers...

o  Should we override the clone() method?  And, if we do, should we be
returning a non-proxy version of a Calendar object? Or, should we ensure
that a fully populated Calendar proxy object get returned?

I'm not clear what you mean by "fully populated Calendar". Do you mean simply instantiated with values from the database? If so, yes.


o Or, should we think about overriding the .equals method on the Calendar proxies? I'm not too thrilled with this since then we'll be attempting to
implement the javadoc for these object types.

Oh oh. Please no.

Craig

Whatever we determine will probably apply to all of our proxy object types, even though we're only hitting this problem with the Calendar proxy due to
the IBM JDK.

Thoughts or suggestions?
Kevin

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to