[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pinaki Poddar updated OPENJPA-370:
----------------------------------
Attachment: TestJIRA370.zip
Test case for LoadFetchGroup.
These test cases employ only basic fields (no relation). They all pass in my
local environment.
Craig, will you please review the cases to see that they are testing correct
semantics of load-fetch-group?
If you think that the test cases are alright then I will add relation fields in
the mix.
> LoadFetchGroup annotation was not recognized during the fetch1
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-370
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-370
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: kernel
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.1.0
> Reporter: Teresa Kan
> Assignee: Teresa Kan
> Fix For: 1.0.1, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: OPENJPA_370_2.patch, TestFetchGroup.zip, TestJIRA370.zip
>
>
> Employee class has a LoadFetchGroup annotation defined on the Rating field,
> when getRating was called, the address should be returned also. However,
> openjpa did not handle the LoadFetchGroup correctly, therefore, address was
> not eargly fetched.
> public class FGEmployee{
> @Id
> private int id;
>
> @OneToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
> private FGAddress address;
>
> @Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
> @LoadFetchGroup("AddressFetchGroup")
> private String rating;
>
> @ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
> private FGManager manager;
> ..
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
