Hi,

As to testing that the EMF objects are useful after serialization, this is a reasonable expectation of any object that is an instance of the Serializable interface.

If it turns out that we don't want to support serializing useful EMF objects, then we should take care to remove the Serializable interface from their implementation.

As I understand it, it is this latter issue that is currently under discussion.

An important, but only tangentially related, issue is why the build is so fragile.

David

Pinaki Poddar wrote:
Hi,
Serializablity requirement on EMF is arising out of necessity rather
than by JPA specifcation. JNDI, too, does not mandate bound objects to be Serializable. But JNDI providers often place that restriction. Non-serializable objects can be bound to JNDI by implementing
javax.naming.Referenceable.
Kodo's JDO product derivation based on OpenJPA is following this
Referenceable route.

But I do not see this in openjpa EntityManagerFactory implementation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Failures in TeamCity Derby build and svn commit: r616972

On Feb 1, 2008 10:17 AM, Pinaki Poddar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Factories needs to be Serializable as they are often placed in JNDI.


The JNDI lookup needs to work for the Factory definition, but it doesn't
require that the actual Factory be present in JNDI.  And, since the JNDI
lookup is meant for the EE (Container) environment, I would guess that
most implementations provide a wrapper object in JNDI for the actual
Factory.

Granted, this wrapper approach is not a requirement.  But, I can't find
the requirement in the spec that the EMF has to be Serializable
either...  :-)

Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Linskey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 7:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Failures in TeamCity Derby build and svn commit: r616972

To be honest, I don't really understand why a BrokerFactory needs to be serializable, so I think probably it'd be good to make sure that there is good reason for that before going too deep into this debugging exercise.

-Patrick

On Jan 31, 2008 5:52 PM, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the hangup is intolerable, let me know, and I'll back out my change tomorrow.
Personally, I'd rather have the TeamCity build be clean while you investigate. As you noted, the error-reporting from surefire is frustratingly inaccurate, and this really erodes the benefit of continuous integration.

It would be handy if I knew a few things.  How to pass in VM debug

args to Maven for its test runs, where to set the OpenJPA logging when Maven runs the tests, and how to pass in the appropriate parameters when running the test case outside of Maven. Any insights on these questions will be appreciated.
I usually just add log configuration to the test cases themselves, in the setUp(...) method:

setUp(Class.class, Class2.class, ..., "openjpa.Log", "SQL=TRACE");

I believe that it is also possible to set this at the command line via
-Dopenjpa.Log=SQL=TRACE types of clauses.

-Patrick


On Jan 31, 2008 4:08 PM, David Ezzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

Progress has been slow on the test failures apparently introduced by
616972.  I have made progress in reproducing the results.

The miscounting in TeamCity is gross. Although it lists 33 failing tests complete with a credible stack trace for each, in fact, there is only one failing test.

Meanwhile, I believe now, that change 616658 is no longer a
suspect.
I get very erratic results here, but they seem to vary more by whether I run "mvn test" after "mvn clean" or "mvn install" after "mvn clean". By doing just what TeamCity does, "mvn clean compile

test", I can finally reproduce the results locally that TeamCity reports in its Compile-Derby build for this change (395, I think).
In spite of this, if I run "mvn
-Dtest=TestCaseInsensitiveKeywordsInJPQL clean compile test" the
test passes.
It would be handy if I knew a few things.  How to pass in VM debug

args to Maven for its test runs, where to set the OpenJPA logging when Maven runs the tests, and how to pass in the appropriate parameters when running the test case outside of Maven. Any insights on these questions will be appreciated.

But at least at this point, I can reproduce locally what TeamCity reports, and although it happened only once out of one try, I am optimistic that it is reproducible. I will continue working this tomorrow.

If the hangup is intolerable, let me know, and I'll back out my change tomorrow.

David Ezzio


David Ezzio wrote:
Hi,

I am convinced that change 616658 (small change to
DBDictionary.java) is the source of the two intermittent failures
that I am seeing locally.
One of those intermittent failures is the failure in TestCaseInsensitiveKeywordsInJPQL.testCaseInsensitiveBooleans which is one of the 33 related failures currently seen in TeamCity
Derby builds.
The other intermittent failure is TestVersion.testVersionTimestamp
which I reported earlier as occurring locally with change
616658.
When I revert change 616658 locally, both of these issues go away even with the changes that I submitted to AbstractBrokerFactory in
change 616972.

I have a question: is it possible to run a build in TeamCity without submitting the change (or conditionally submitting the
change) to SVN?
I'd like to find out if reverting 616658 will fix the issue.  If

so, then I can try to figure out why it's a problem.

Thanks,

David

David Ezzio wrote:
No, but I'm taking a look since my changes appear to be the
cause.
Patrick Linskey wrote:
5. The tests are now failing in the automated build; any idea why this might be?

-Patrick

On Jan 30, 2008 6:11 PM, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,

A few questions:

1. Were you seeing this cause problems somewhere? I.e., when do
we serialize BrokerFactory instances?

2. Why not just move the initialization code to the declaration
line (instead of the constructor)?

3. It looks like there are other transactional structures that might not be properly handled in serialization / deserialization (lifecycle listeners, for example). Should we
be making more changes there?
-Patrick


On Jan 30, 2008 4:59 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: dezzio
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:59:02 2008 New Revision: 616972

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=616972&view=rev
Log:
Allow EntityManagerFactory objects to be serialized and deserialized successfully.

Added:

openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apa
ch e/openjpa/persistence/simple/TestSerializedFactory.java
(with props)
Modified:

openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjp
a/ kernel/AbstractBrokerFactory.java


Modified:
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjp
a/ kernel/AbstractBrokerFactory.java

URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/sr
c/ main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/AbstractBrokerFactory.ja
va ?rev=616972&r1=616971&r2=616972&view=diff

============================================================
==
================

---
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjp
a/ kernel/AbstractBrokerFactory.java
(original)
+++
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjp
a/ kernel/AbstractBrokerFactory.java Wed Jan 30 16:59:02 2008 @@ -147,8 +147,7 @@
      */
     protected AbstractBrokerFactory(OpenJPAConfiguration
config) {
         _conf = config;
-        _pcClassLoaders = new ConcurrentReferenceHashSet(
-            ConcurrentReferenceHashSet.WEAK);
+        getPcClassLoaders();
     }

     /**
@@ -287,13 +286,13 @@
                     if (needsSub(cls))
                         toRedefine.add(cls);
                 }
-                _pcClassLoaders.add(loader);
+                getPcClassLoaders().add(loader);
                 _pcClassNames = c;
             }
             _persistentTypesLoaded = true;
         } else {
             // reload with this loader
-            if (_pcClassLoaders.add(loader)) {
+            if (getPcClassLoaders().add(loader)) {
for (Iterator itr = _pcClassNames.iterator();
itr.hasNext();) {
                     try {
                         Class cls = @@ -818,4 +817,15 @@
             _transactional.remove (_trans);
                }
        }
+
+   /**
+ * Method insures that deserialized EMF has this + reference
re-instantiated
+    */
+   private Collection getPcClassLoaders() {
+      if (_pcClassLoaders == null)
+        _pcClassLoaders = new ConcurrentReferenceHashSet(
+            ConcurrentReferenceHashSet.WEAK);
+
+      return _pcClassLoaders;
+   }
 }

Added:
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apa
ch e/openjpa/persistence/simple/TestSerializedFactory.java

URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persisten
ce -jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/Te
st SerializedFactory.java?rev=616972&view=auto

============================================================
==
================

---
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apa
ch e/openjpa/persistence/simple/TestSerializedFactory.java
(added)
+++
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apa
ch e/openjpa/persistence/simple/TestSerializedFactory.java
Wed Jan 30 16:59:02 2008
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under +one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE +file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this +file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in +compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License +at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in +writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on

+an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for +the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.openjpa.persistence.simple;
+
+import java.io.*;
+
+import javax.persistence.EntityManager; import +javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
+import javax.persistence.EntityTransaction;
+
+import junit.textui.TestRunner; import +org.apache.openjpa.persistence.OpenJPAEntityManager; +import +org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.SingleEMFTestCase;
+
+/**
+ * Tests that a EntityManagerFactory can be used after
serialization.
+ *
+ * @author David Ezzio
+ */
+public class TestSerializedFactory
+    extends SingleEMFTestCase {
+
+    public void setUp() {
+        setUp(AllFieldTypes.class);
+    }
+
+    public void testSerializedEntityManagerFactory() throws
Exception {
+        // serialize and deserialize the entity manager
factory
+        ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new
ByteArrayOutputStream();
+        ObjectOutputStream oos = new
ObjectOutputStream(baos);
+        oos.writeObject(emf);
+        EntityManagerFactory emf2 =
+            (EntityManagerFactory) new ObjectInputStream(
+            new
ByteArrayInputStream(baos.toByteArray())).readObject();
+
+        // use the deserialized entity manager factory
+        assertTrue("The deserialized entity manager factory

+ is not
open",
+            emf2.isOpen());
+        EntityManager em = emf2.createEntityManager();
+        assertTrue("The newly created entity manager is not

+ open",
em.isOpen());
+
+        // exercise the entity manager produced from the
deserialized EMF
+        em.getTransaction().begin();
+        em.persist(new AllFieldTypes());
+        em.getTransaction().commit();
+
+        // close the extra resources
+        em.close();
+        assertFalse("The entity manager is not closed",
em.isOpen());
+        emf2.close();
+ assertFalse("The entity manager factory is not + closed",
emf2.isOpen());
+    }
+
+    public static void main(String[] args) {
+        TestRunner.run(TestSerializedFactory.class);
+    }
+}
+

Propchange:
openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apa
ch e/openjpa/persistence/simple/TestSerializedFactory.java

------------------------------------------------------------
--
----------------

    svn:eol-style = native




--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907





--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907



--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the

use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.


Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain 
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated 
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally 
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received 
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete 
it.

Reply via email to