Hi,
Based on an experiment, it looks like the regimentation of existing
files to native will be easy to perform.
In r619411, I changed two files from as-is to native. One was present
on my client with Unix line endings and one was present with DOS line
endings. I changed the eol property for both files to native and
committed. When updated from the server, they both came down with DOS
line endings, the appropriate native translation for my Windows machine.
On the downside, the file that was in DOS line endings was converted on
the server and recorded in the change notice as the entire file changing.
I propose that I find an hour or two next week and regiment all files
with a non-native setting to the native setting (about 60% of the code
base).
David
David Jencks wrote:
I think infra strongly suggest everyone uses these svn client settings
to avoid most of this kind of problem:
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
I think there are scripts to help normalize stuff that has strayed from
these recommendations but I'm not sure where they are.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for volunteering to do this.
I recall we discussed whether to use LF or native. But I don't recall
the outcome.
The reason to use LF is for Windows users who use unix tools. The
reason to use native is for Windows users who use native tools
(Notepad). I personally don't care, except that my svn preferences
file is set up to use LF for new files (for another project).
Craig
On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:41 AM, David Ezzio wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it, files within the SVN repository are either text
or binary, and if text, they have as a property one of the five SVN
settings: CR (Mac), LF (Unix), CRLF (DOS), native (convert to/from
client platform) or as-is (no conversion, no regimentation).
Currently, the OpenJPA repository has text files for three of these
settings. Most are as-is, a few are LF, and the remainder are native.
As I understand it, native is the preferred attribute for text files
as SVN will take care to convert to and from the client's platform
preference upon update and commit.
I believe it would be a relatively simple matter for me to convert
all of the files to one agreed upon format, anytime that we'd care to
do so.
Thoughts?
David
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!