On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Di, 11.11.2008: >> >>> This points out the possible problem that the jpa 1.0 spec >>> appeared to be part of the ejb 3.0 spec so I gave it a spec >>> version number of 3.0. Any suggestions about what to do >>> about this would be appreciated. >>> >> >> >> Do we really need to change anything? >> >> Imho the current >> <artifactId> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec >> with a >> <version> 1.0 >> is somehow not really maven stylish, but it doesn't hinder us ;) >> The version of the jpa-spec actually is 1.0 and we do not have any problem >> other than the confusing term '3.0' in the groupId since this references EJB >> and not JPA. >> >> So I'd suggest to simply use >> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >> and we're done. >> > > Yes, this would be the thing to do. > > The original JPA was released as part of EJB, which had gotten to the 3.0 > level. But JPA was brand, spanking new 1.0. > > The current JPA specification (JSR 317, now in Public Review Draft stage) > is being billed as JPA Version 2.0. So 2.0-SNAPSHOT seems completely > correct. > > So even though it's confusing because of the original geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec > nomenclature, I'd say we confuse things even more if we change the artifact > id or group id (again). > That's easiest for migration. It's unfortunate that geronimo-jpa_x.y_spec doesn't follow the same pattern as the other geronimo specs though. I have no strong feelings either way though. We might want to keep the EA nomenclature so 2.0-EA-SNAPSHOT or 2.0-SNAPSHOT-EA could be the current version. Once the spec finalizes 2.0-SNAPSHOT seems fair. -mike > Craig > >> >> >> Humm, btw, what's really confusing me now is the fact, that there are 2 >> specs online: >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/geronimo-spec/ >> >> I've always used the geronimo-spec until now, and this doesn't contain the >> jpa spec anyway. >> >> So could someone shed a light on this for me (I'm not a geronimized one)? >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> > Craig L Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >
