Evan - I looked back over my notes and the inserts showed marginal improvement(Sorry I don't have hard numbers, I ran this a couple weeks back). The largest gains where in the number of selects executed.
Rick Evan Ireland wrote: > > Rick, > > If you enable DBCP and run the quoted benchmark using JPA, what > improvement > do you see with the insert throughput? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rick Curtis [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, 5 February 2009 9:21 a.m. >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Improving out of the box performance >> >> >> After reading this >> http://terrazadearavaca.blogspot.com/2008/12/jpa-implementations- >> comparison.html >> blog post , I decided to do some performance(ish) testing on my local >> system >> and I also came the conclusion that openJPA isn't the fastest out of the >> box(I don't think that's a surprise to anyone). It was easy to get >> something >> working, but it didn't work as fast as it could/should have. Ease of use >> is >> a high priority when a developer is trying out a new technology, but not >> the >> only priority. >> >> A steaming pile that is easy to use, is still a steaming pile. :-) >> >> In an attempt to make openJPA perform better out of the box, I'd like to >> see >> DBCP packaged with openJPA and have the docs updated to stress the use >> DBCP >> rather than a direct DB connection. This won't add much in the way of >> complexity, but it will help the performance greatly. I wrote a blog post >> about this very topic that can be found >> http://webspherepersistence.blogspot.com/2009/01/jpa-connection- >> pooling.html >> here . >> >> Any thoughts? >> -- >> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Improving-out-of-the- >> box-performance-tp2271261p2271261.html >> Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Improving-out-of-the-box-performance-tp2271261p2271423.html Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
