Hi Pinaki, Before I vote I'd like to know what you propose to do for existing files? Should they be reformatted, left as is with the occasional long line, or should we preserve history (like Andriod [1])?
I'd also like to propose 100 as the limit (120 makes three way diffs tricky to fit on the screen). David Ezzio suggested 90 in the [DISCUSS] thread so that might warrant consideration. [1] http://source.android.com/submit-patches/code-style-guide -mike On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Proposal to increase the line width limit to 120 chars from existing 80 > chars. > > +1 : change it to 120 (or something greater than 80) > -1 : keep it to 80 (or something less than 80) > 0 : i do not care > > > > > Reason: New API classes/methods have long names and often require multiple > generic parameters with bounds. 80-char line width is hampering readability > than helping it. > > > > ----- > Pinaki > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/-VOTE-%3A-Extend-the-source-test-code-line-width-to-120-chars-tp3113489p3113489.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
