Can you believe how much activity there is on this "simple" issue? ;-)
+1 for 120 -1 for reformatting existing files (required) +1 to allow reformatting as needed On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for 120 > -1 require reformatting for existing files > +1 reformat as needed for better future viewing > > -Jeremy > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +120 > > > > > > -Donald > > > > > > > > Pinaki Poddar wrote: > > > >> OK, given that the electorate prefers wide span of line width choices, > let > >> us > >> change the vote scoring process a bit as follows:) > >> 1. your vote value is a number between 40 to 120 denoting the line > width > >> you propose. > >> 2. the final tally is average of all vote values rounded to nearest > >> multiple of 10. > >> If the final tally is more than 80 we increase the allowed line width > >> If it is less than 80, the vote is not passed and existing limit of 80 > >> stays. > >> > >> The vote is open till Friday June 19 18:00 US Central Time. > >> > >> ----- > >> Pinaki > >> > > >
