[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-1177:
----------------------------------

      Component/s: validation
      Description: 
We need to upgrade from CR2 level of the API 
(geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-EA2-SNAPSHOT) to the ust released  CR3 level 
(geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-EA3-SNAPSHOT).

Moving from the Validation 1.0.CR2 to 1.0.CR3 levels are going to cause us some 
churn:
- The 4 descriptor class were moved into a javax.validation.metadata package.
- A new javax.validation.Path was introduced for iterable nodes, which replaces 
some String usage in ConstraintViolation and TraversableResolver.

Note: Either the agimatec-validation code will need to be updated or we'll have 
to switch to using the RI for testing.

    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0

> Upgrade to Bean Validation JSR-303 1.0 CR3 Spec API
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1177
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: validation
>            Reporter: Donald Woods
>            Assignee: Donald Woods
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> We need to upgrade from CR2 level of the API 
> (geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-EA2-SNAPSHOT) to the ust released  CR3 
> level (geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-EA3-SNAPSHOT).
> Moving from the Validation 1.0.CR2 to 1.0.CR3 levels are going to cause us 
> some churn:
> - The 4 descriptor class were moved into a javax.validation.metadata package.
> - A new javax.validation.Path was introduced for iterable nodes, which 
> replaces some String usage in ConstraintViolation and TraversableResolver.
> Note: Either the agimatec-validation code will need to be updated or we'll 
> have to switch to using the RI for testing.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to