In writing test cases for the PersistenceProviderResolver and PersistenceProviderResolverHolder, I discovered that the current implementation of the resolver will handle multiple providers specified in the javax.persistence.spi.PersistenceProvider file. However, I expected just the first one to be read since the spec says the following: "The contents of the file should provide *the* name of the provider implementation class.....", which implies that only 1 name should lbe provided. Should this implementation be considered a bug, or an enhancement? Comments/opinions?
-- Thanks - Dianne
