OpenJPA cannot store POJOs if a corresponding record already exists
-------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: OPENJPA-1896
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1896
             Project: OpenJPA
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
         Environment: Eclipse, Sun Java 1.6, Ubuntu Lucid, Guice 
JPAPersistModule, build-time enhance.xml
            Reporter: Cefn Hoile


If a POJO is created using a java constructor, merge() cannot store the newly 
constructed object's data if this means updating a pre-existing record with a 
matching identity.

This is a major bug since it means applications where the objects have a 
natural key cannot use OpenJPA. In my case the example was a filesystem; each 
crawl of the filesystem generates its own data objects with file path as the 
natural key. These objects then need to be stored into the database. Previous 
crawls may have encountered the same files, and the merge operation should 
cause the latest data from the POJO to be stored in the pre-existing record.

Instead, any attempt to execute either merge() or persist() on an independently 
constructed object with a matching record identity in the database triggers the 
same error in the database layer, since OpenJPA attempts to execute an insert 
for a pre-existing primary key, throwing...
org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.ReportingSQLException: ERROR: duplicate key value 
violates unique constraint "file_pkey" {prepstmnt 32879825 INSERT INTO file 
(locationString, location, version, folder) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)  [params=?, ?, 
?, ?]} [code=0, state=23505]

>From discussion with Rick Curtis on the [email protected] list, this is 
>because the version field on a POJO which is unmanaged is not yet set. 

An ASSUMPTION seems to be made that no such record exists in the database 
already since it wasn't loaded from the database in the first place, so a 
persist is attempted. Instead, I recommend the database is QUERIED TO FIND OUT 
if such a record already exists, and the version field is set correspondingly 
before attempting the merge() 

Here is the corresponding thread containing Ricks comments and links to an 
example in Github which can recreate the problem.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openjpa-users/201011.mbox/%[email protected]%3e

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to