Hi Pinaki, I haven't spent a great deal of time looking into this. But, you are probably right -- the JDO footprint is probably very small. I was just fishing to see how much interest there was in JDO -- just in case we would find some area of the code that is JDO-centric and it's either confusing, incorrect, or affecting performance.
Thanks, Kevin On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > OpenJPA project is for providing a JPA implementation, not a JDO > implementation. > OpenJPA is a misnomer :) > > Seriously speaking, what exactly do you suggest to remove to eol/get rid > of JDO? My read is that JDO-awareness has a very small footprint in terms > of > codelines. > > ----- > Pinaki Poddar > Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project > -- > View this message in context: > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-JDO-usage-end-of-life-tp6876837p6888872.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
