oh, then all is well!

sorry for the noise ;)

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 3:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [jira] [Resolved] (OPENJPA-2087) Remove or limit the use of the 
> ConcreteClassGenerator
> 
> Hi guys,
> I'm confused by this conversation.  OpenJPA has been only supporting Java 6
> since the development of OpenJPA 2.1.  The source and target levels for 1.6
> have seen set since revision 1022964 (10/15/2010).
> 
> The changes that have recently been introduced have allowed OpenJPA to be
> built by Java 7, but that is not a requirement at this point.  OpenJPA can
> continue to be built and execute in either a Java 6 or Java 7 environment.
> The use of Java 5 has not been part of the story since OpenJPA 2.1.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Craig L Russell 
> <craig.russ...@oracle.com>wrote:
> 
>>  Just a thought: does this get caught when compiling with source=1.5?
>> 
>>  Craig
>> 
>> 
>>  On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> 
>>   We really need to take care that we don't pickup some java6 only stuff
>>>  like String.isEmpty() in our code. Sadly this doesn't get detected 
> when
>>>  compiling with target=1.5 :(
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Thus we need run the TCK with java5 runtime to verify that all things
>>>  work.
>>> 
>>>  LieGrue,
>>>  strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>> 
>>>>  From: Kevin Sutter (Resolved) (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
>>>>  To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
>>>>  Cc:
>>>>  Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 9:14 PM
>>>>  Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (OPENJPA-2087) Remove or limit the use 
> of the
>>>>  ConcreteClassGenerator
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>      [
>>>>  https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OPENJPA-2087?page=**
>>>> 
> com.atlassian.jira.plugin.**system.issuetabpanels:all-**tabpanel<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel>
>>>>  ]
>>>> 
>>>>  Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-2087.
>>>>  ------------------------------**-----
>>>> 
>>>>        Resolution: Fixed
>>>>     Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
>>>> 
>>>>   Remove or limit the use of the ConcreteClassGenerator
>>>>>  ------------------------------**-----------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>>                  Key: OPENJPA-2087
>>>>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/**
>>>>> 
> jira/browse/OPENJPA-2087<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2087>
>>>>>              Project: OpenJPA
>>>>>           Issue Type: Improvement
>>>>>           Components: build / infrastructure
>>>>>             Reporter: Jacob Nowosatka
>>>>>             Assignee: Kevin Sutter
>>>>>             Priority: Minor
>>>>>              Fix For: 2.2.0
>>>>> 
>>>>>          Attachments: OPENJPA-2087-1.patch, OPENJPA-2087-2.patch
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Now that we have to only support Java 6 in OpenJPA 2.x, there 
> is
>>>>>  discussion
>>>>> 
>>>>  about revisiting the issue of removing or limiting the use of the
>>>>  ConcreteClassGenerator. This was originally discussed in 
> OpenJPA-1520
>>>>  [1].  This
>>>>  would help cleanup some of the code and would hopefully result in 
> some
>>>>  performance gains, despite that it didn't seem to help with 
> earlier
>>>>  primitive tests.
>>>> 
>>>>>  [1] 
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OPENJPA-1520<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1520>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  --
>>>>  This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>  If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>>>  administrators:
>>>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/**ContactAdministrators!default.
>>>> 
> **jspa<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators%21default.jspa>
>>>>  For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/**
>>>>  software/jira <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>  Craig L Russell
>>  Architect, Oracle
>>  http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>  408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.**com 
> <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
>>  P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to