[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rick Curtis updated OPENJPA-2057:
---------------------------------

    Assignee: Pinaki Poddar  (was: Rick Curtis)
    
> Rethinking ClassLoading architecture 
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2057
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2057
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: kernel
>            Reporter: Pinaki Poddar
>            Assignee: Pinaki Poddar
>
> This issue proposes an overhaul of the classloading architecture.
> Background:
> ------------------
> OpenJPA runtime needs to load classes and resources at various time points in 
> its life cycle and employs various classloading strategies at different parts 
> of its code base. 
> These are few broad categories of classes/resources OpenJPA needs to load
> 1. Resources: user-specified resources such as persistence.xml or orm.xml
> 2. Persistent Domain classes
> 3. Native Plug-ins: Implementation of interfaces e.g. UpdateManager that are 
> supplied by OpenJPA and packaged in its own distribution
> 4. User Plug-ins: Implementation of interfaces e.g. MappingStrategy or 
> ValueHandlers that the user has supplied via configuration and packaged in 
> deployed units
> 5. Temporary classloader for java agent or weaving code loading domain 
> classes to enhance them prior to their use
> To load these different artifacts by their name, OpenJPA at different places 
> employ available classloaders such as 
>    i) the current thread's context class loader 
>    ii) the clasloader that loaded OpenJPA native classes/interfaces 
>   iii) the classloader that loaded a deployed application which can vary 
> based on the container (Spring, OSGi, JEE) environment
>   iv) system classloader   
> The problem is the decision about which classloader is appropriate in a given 
> context is quite scattered. This weakness appears in numerous places where a 
> method is supplied with a ClassLoader and if the supplied loader is null, the 
> method chooses a classloader (often the context classloader) or a class has 
> its own classforname() method that tries a series of classloaders etc. 
> This is a perennial problem and manifested in several reported bugs whose 
> resolutions often introduced further localized logic to account for the point 
> defects, thereby  accentuating the same trends that I believe is the root 
> cause of the problem itself. 
> Proposed solution/design:
> -------------------------------------
> Unify classloading decision in a singular abstraction. 
> Allow that abstraction to cope with classloading regimes of different 
> containers (Spring, OSGi, JEE etc). 
> The natural candidate for unifying classloading is existing Configuration 
> object. This object is a per persistence unit singleton and available 
> throughout the runtime. 
> However, certain class/resource loading must take place even before a 
> Configuration instance is instantiated. For example, to locate and load the 
> persistence.xml itself. 
> Also note that the persistence.xml or orm.xml may contain fully-qualified 
> names of persistent domain classes or  plug-in names (both native and 
> custom/user variety) and they can occur either by their  fully-qualified 
> class name or registered alias. The specialized parsers often has to load the 
> class given their parsed string names or aliases. 
> The bootstrap sequence of OpenJPA runtime is to construct a specific 
> ConfigurationProvider and a series of specialized parsers to parse meta-data 
> of various sorts (annotations, mapping xml, persistence.xml). These 
> ConfigurationProviders are responsibilities of ProductDerivation -- the core 
> mechanics that contributes their individual aspects to build up a 
> Configuration. 
> Given this existing well-designed bootstrap strategy, here is a proposal
>   1. Let each ProductDerivation make their decision on how they will load 
> whatever they need to load using whatever classloader they may need. For 
> example, a OSGi ProductDerivation will use a bundle classloader to load its 
> relevant resources. This phase occurs *before* a persistence unit (i.e. 
> EntityManagerFactory) is constructed.
>   2. Once the ProductDerivations have finished their loading using their own 
> ConfigurationProvider, they transfer the accumulated information to a 
> Configuration instance which essentially becomes the holder of entire runtime 
> information for an EntityManagerFactory. During this transfer phase, let the 
> ProductDerivations set the classloader as well into the Configuration 
> instance.
>   3. Once the Configuration instance has the classloader, this classloader is 
> used throughout the codebase.
> But what kind of classloader is used by the Configuration that will suit 
> complex needs of class/resource loading? 
> OpenJPA already has a powerful abstraction called MultiClassLoader which can 
> employ an ordered series of (possibly unrelated) classloaders. So that 
> MultiClassLoader is the correct classloader for Configuration instance. The 
> ProductDerivation or ConfigurationProvider can add/remove their 
> contributions. 
> I understand that a change of this nature could be destabilizing in 
> short-term. Also the change is difficult to validate across various container 
> environments. I hope the community users will help by suggesting and testing 
> such an overhaul to streamline OpenJPA classloading for long-term 
> sustainability and maintenance. 
>    
>   

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to