damn, failed at site deploy :(
distributionManagement.site.url=scp://people.apache.org/home/${site.deploy.user.name}/public_html/openjpa/2.3.0/staging-site/.
[INFO] Unsupported protocol: 'scp' for site deployment to
distributionManagement.site.url=scp://people.apache.org/home/${site.deploy.user.name}/public_html/openjpa/2.3.0/staging-site/.
will do the rest of the release process manually and fix this for the next
release iteration
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg
> <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2013, 9:58
> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>
> Wohuuu, release:prepare went through finally. Now off for running the final
> steps.
>
> We need to add a few things to our documentation
>
> * JAI is needed for docbook. We should add the installation instructions to
> our
> release prerequisites.
> * we should remove -DskipTests from our release instructions. There were a
> few
> tests which failed during release and which are now fixed.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 23:10
>> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>
>> I finally installed jai. damnit...
>>
>> Now I am almost through. Just getting this error now
>>
>> <testcase time="2.124"
>>
> classname="org.apache.openjpa.integration.validation.TestConstraints"
>> name="testNullConstraintIgnored">
>> <failure message="Caught unexpected exception =
>> <openjpa-2.3.0-r422266:1537254M fatal store error>
>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.RollbackException: Table/View
>> 'OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE' does not exist
>> . {SELECT SEQUENCE_VALUE FROM OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE WHERE ID = ? FOR
>> UPDATE WITH RR} [code=20000, state=42X05]"
>>
> type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
>
>
>> Caught unexpected except
>> ion = <openjpa-2.3.0-r422266:1537254M fatal store error>
>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.RollbackException: Table/View
>> 'OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE' does not exist. {SELECT
>> SEQUENCE_VALUE FROM OPENJPA_SEQUENCE
>> _TABLE WHERE ID = ? FOR UPDATE WITH RR} [code=20000, state=42X05]
>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>> at
>>
> org.apache.openjpa.integration.validation.TestConstraints.testNullConstraintIgnored(TestConstraints.java:256)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>> at
>>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>> at
>>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runTest(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:579)
>> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
>> at
>>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runBare(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:566)
>> at
>>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runBare(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:542)
>> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
>>
>> The following should bring you there:
>>
>> mvn -P apache-release,test-derby,bval,test-derbymem clean install
>>
>>
>> Anyone has a plan what's wrong? Too tired for searching today alread.
>> Will continue tomorrow evening.
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>;
> Mark
>> Struberg <[email protected]>
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 21:15
>>> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>
>>> And another one
>>>
>>>
>>> Could not find artifact com.sun:jai_core:jar:1.1.3
>>>
>>> we should not recommend creating docbx during release. This does just
> not
>> work
>>> out of the box but requires non ALv2 stuff manually installed on a
> box.
>>> We can still create all the javadocs and documentation from the tag
> later
>> on
>>> after the release went fine.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>;
>> Mark
>>> Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 16:41
>>>> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> just FYI.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still fighting with the javadoc-maven-plugin. Will now
>> continue
>>> with
>>>> trying to create a cleansetup.
>>>>
>>>> The current problem I face is that the aggregate javadoc needs
> the
>>> dependencies
>>>> built already. Means creating the javadoc upfront does not work
> once
>> you
>>>> increase the project version (or build completely clean in
> offline
>> mode). I
>>> have
>>>> isolated the issue and am currently working on a solution which I
> will
>>
>>> later
>>>> also commit to trunk (once all stuff is finally working as I like
> it).
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: I'm in IRC if somebody likes to join the pain ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "[email protected]"
>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 22:32
>>>>> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> seems I will fix all the checkstyle related stuff later. This
>
>> needs
>>> some
>>>> serious cleanup.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should move all the stuff in our root pom.xml into an own
>>> parent/pom.xml
>>>> and add a checkstyle module. Then we can add the checkstyle rules
> as
>>> dependency
>>>> and do not need to carry around all the stuff via absolute file
> paths.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: Rick Curtis <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 19:18
>>>>>> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 on updating the checkstyle
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Mark Struberg
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've already removed all unused imports in
> 2.3.x and
>>
>>> trunk.
>>>>>>> Will remove all tabs and replace them with 4
> characters
>>> tonight as
>>>> well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We might also activate the maven-checkstyle-plugin
> to
>> make
>>> sure
>>>> this
>>>>>>> doesn't get worse in the future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> > To: openjpa-dev <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> > Cc:
>>>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 9:27
>>>>>>> > Subject: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Could you please walk through the unresolved
>>> OpenJPA-2.3.0
>>>> issues and
>>>>>>> set those
>>>>>>> > who you doubt should be fixed already to
>>> 'resolved'?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENJPA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.3.0%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I hope to start with the actual release task
> either
>>
>>> tonight
>>>> or
>>>>>> tomorrow
>>>>>>> morning.
>>>>>>> > Means I gonna send another mail in 15 hours
> and
>> then
>>> will
>>>> transit the
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> > unresolved issues to 2.4.0.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > There is also another thing which I like to
> do:
>> finally
>>> get
>>>> rid of all
>>>>>>> the bad
>>>>>>> > tabs and unused imports in 2.3.x and trunk.
>>>>>>> > See OPENJPA-2200. I will _not_ change any
> lines
>> other
>>> than
>>>> tabs and
>>>>>>> unused
>>>>>>> > imports so far.
>>>>>>> > Patches should thus still apply fine even
> across
>> older
>>>> versions.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > LieGrue,
>>>>>>> > strub
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Rick Curtis*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
