[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14275209#comment-14275209 ]
Vermeulen commented on OPENJPA-2559: ------------------------------------ May be the same issue as OPENJPA-665 that was already fixed back in 2008 (or was it not tested for UPDATE instead of INSERT?), but the issue is still present for us using OpenJPA 2.3.0 on a sql server 2012 database. > OpenJPA silently ignores assigning a null value to a non-nullable column > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OPENJPA-2559 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2559 > Project: OpenJPA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: kernel > Affects Versions: 2.3.0 > Reporter: Vermeulen > Attachments: NonNullable.java, NonNullableColumnTest.java > > > OpenJPA should throw a PersistenceException when you merge an entity that has > null for a field that is mapped to a non-nullable column (@Column(nullable = > false)). This should also happen when you set the field to null for an > attached entity and then commit the change. > This works fine for entities that haven't been persisted yet (INSERT). > However this does NOT happen for entities that are already persistent with a > non-null value for the field (UPDATE). When doing entityManager.merge, the > returned entity has null for the field, but the database still has the old > value. The entity returned by entityManager.find also returns this old > non-null value. Similarly, after setting the field to null on an attached > entity and committing the transaction it is still null in the entity, but not > in the database. > This behavior makes it a lot harder to detect programming errors where you > accidentally attempt to update a non-nullable column to null, or where you > made a mistake in the mapping and actually expected the column to be > nullable. (Unless you also use the JSR 303 @NotNull annotation.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)