Which branch are you referring to, Mark?  For the JPA 2.1 development?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> I’d say we keep the jpa-2.1 work in the branch for now and use trunk for
> maintenance for now.
> If we feel that we are close to getting JPA-2.1 done then we can switch
> branches pretty easily.
>
> I’d rather like to avoid tons of merges to different branches. That
> doesn’t scale well with SVN ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 01.06.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Kevin Sutter <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hi Romain,
> > Thanks for kickstarting the JPA 2.1 activity!  This may be a rough ride
> > until we get some of the bumps figured out...  For example, I wasn't
> aware
> > of a specific branch for the JPA 2.1 work activity.  I thought we were
> > going to do JPA 2.1 in trunk now that we cut the 2.4 release...  Unless I
> > missed something in the discussion.
> >
> > As far as missing a few things...  Wouldn't surprise me.  The JPA 2.1
> work
> > kind of stalled after the initial work was defined.  Here are the tasks
> > that I originally outlined based on the updates in the spec:
> > http://openjpa.apache.org/jpa-2.1-tasks.html
> >
> > Also, note that Pinaki had done some initial work in his sandbox.  The
> > sandbox is still there, but it's based off an old version of trunk, so
> I'm
> > not sure how difficult the merge will be:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/sandboxes/21
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2592
> >>
> >> wonder what's the status of 21 branch, seen impl was started but seems
> to
> >> miss few things (since my test doesn't pass)
> >>
> >> any inputs?
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to