[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15282705#comment-15282705
]
Glen Mazza commented on OPENJPA-2401:
-------------------------------------
The patch doesn't really fix the problem stated in this ticket, that of
unnecessarily giving a warning of needing to declare a one-to-many relationship
when such a relationship was already declared in the orm.xml. The outputting
of the warning message is the problem, not its text, which is still going to
mislead people that there's a problem when there is none.
> "Fields 'xxx' are not a default persistent type" warning message ignoring XML
> configuration.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2401
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2401
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: logging
> Affects Versions: 2.2.2
> Reporter: Glen Mazza
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Hi, unless I set "@OneToMany" as shown here:
> https://github.com/gmazza/blog-samples/blob/master/jpa_and_junit/src/main/java/entities/Department.java#L47
> I'll get this warning message:
> 678 CompanyPU WARN [main] openjpa.Runtime - Fields "employees" are not a
> default persistent type, and do not have any annotations indicating their
> persistence strategy. They will be treated as non-persistent. If you intended
> for these fields to be persistent, be sure to annotate them appropriately.
> Otherwise annotate them with @Transient.
> However, I shouldn't have to set that annotation because I've already
> declared one-to-many via XML configuration:
> https://github.com/gmazza/blog-samples/blob/master/jpa_and_junit/src/main/resources/entities/department.orm.xml#L29
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
