IMO we have to decide if we going to support one major version or two of them As far as I can see there is not too much active devs on the project So it might be wise to support only latest version ...
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 23:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +0 (I don't see 2.4 used here since most projects moved to 3 from my side > of the fence but no blocker to do it if anyone does) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le sam. 2 févr. 2019 à 13:30, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> > a écrit : > > > Il 2 febbraio 2019 12:12:54 CET, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> > > ha scritto: > > >Hi folks! > > > > > >I've done quite a few fixes in the last few weeks. > > >Some related to new JPA-2.1/2.2 features, but others totally unrelated > > >to that. > > >Do we also want to port them back to OpenJPA-2.4.x? > > > > +1, thanks Mark. > > Regards. > > > > -- > > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, > > OpenJPA, PonyMail > > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
