[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17059171#comment-17059171
]
Maxim Solodovnik commented on OPENJPA-2798:
-------------------------------------------
Hello [~struberg],
I believe my previous commit should be _partially_ reverted
All changes related to {{Automatic-Module_name}} should remain (it will not
break anything but will make OpenJPA more consistent)
Unfortunately both openjpa and geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec SNAPSHOTs are not
available (And I was unable to build openpa due to missing
geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec)
> OpenJPA need to be more Java11 friendly
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2798
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2798
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: third-party
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Maxim Solodovnik
> Assignee: Maxim Solodovnik
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.1.1
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In case one will add OpenJPA as a dependency to Java11 modularized project
> the following issue will arise:
> openjpa depends on "Apache Geronimo JPA Spec 2.2"
> geronimo jpa doesn't have automatic module name and automatically being
> resolved as
> geronimo.jpa.2.2.spec
> Which is invalid java identifier :(((
> I believe OpenJPA should be more Java11 friendly
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
