Yes, actually meant our latest javax branch which is 3.x But likely the answer is the same :)
LieGrue, Strub > Am 25.07.2023 um 22:07 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>: > > I agree. > No waste of time with backport > > Le mar. 25 juil. 2023, 14:35, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Congrats Mark! >> >> Think 2.x is kind of dead so I wouldnt consume time with it but no issue if >> somebody wants. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> < >> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>> >> >> >> Le mar. 25 juil. 2023 à 14:23, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> We do now exclusively use xbean-asm for creating our enhancement and >> stuff. >>> The next step is to do battle-testing. Gonna do that in my company. >>> Do you think it also makes sense to backport this to OpenJPA 2.x? >>> Think it's probably a bit too much work, but otoh could give us important >>> feedback about the quality of the rewrite. wdyt? >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>
