This job can be used to test custom branches with Java 17
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenJPA/job/openjpa-pr-17/  :))

On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 20:24, Paulo Araújo <cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
>
> I've pushed the branch to github. Although the build is still broke in GH 
> actions, it works locally on:
>
> - derby
>
> - h2 (2.3.x), both in-memory and tcp dbs
>
> - postgresql (latest)
>
> - mariadb (lts)
>
> - mysql (lts)
>
>
>
> The branch is still on JPA 3.1 because I wanted to have a working and green 
> tested baseline after bumps on dependencies, but before starting actual work 
> on impl. The duplicate branch push is due my rebase after the recently 
> merging of pending PRs.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paulo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---- Em qua, 02 jul 2025 22:15:42 -0300 Maxim Solodovnik 
> <solomax...@gmail.com> escreveu ---
>
>
>
> +1 for move on :)
>
> from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025, 03:02 Romain Manni-Bucau < mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
> > sounds good to me
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau < https://x.com/rmannibucau > | .NET Blog
> > < https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/ > | Blog < https://rmannibucau.github.io/ 
> > >
> > | Old
> > Blog < http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > | Github
> > < https://github.com/rmannibucau > | LinkedIn
> > < https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > | Book
> > <
> > https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 21:36, Paulo Araújo < 
> > mailto:cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid >
> > a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Could we start the work to evolve openjpa to JPA 3.2?
> > >
> > > I've made some changes in my branch to push minimum JDK version to 17.
> > >
> > > For now, it is just some bumps in dependencies versions of the project,
> > > some cleanups in violations of checkstyle and removal of deprecated
> > methods
> > > (mostly on the SecurityManager front). The build still works, but it
> > > touches a big chunk of files and the revision would be a nightmare, I
> > guess.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I was planning to submit this startup work as a tentative 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > version and keep working on the features added in spec (a lot more than
> > > 3.0-to-3.1).
> > >
> > > What do you think about it?
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Paulo
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to