This job can be used to test custom branches with Java 17 https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenJPA/job/openjpa-pr-17/ :))
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 20:24, Paulo Araújo <cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > > I've pushed the branch to github. Although the build is still broke in GH > actions, it works locally on: > > - derby > > - h2 (2.3.x), both in-memory and tcp dbs > > - postgresql (latest) > > - mariadb (lts) > > - mysql (lts) > > > > The branch is still on JPA 3.1 because I wanted to have a working and green > tested baseline after bumps on dependencies, but before starting actual work > on impl. The duplicate branch push is due my rebase after the recently > merging of pending PRs. > > > > Best regards, > > Paulo > > > > > > > ---- Em qua, 02 jul 2025 22:15:42 -0300 Maxim Solodovnik > <solomax...@gmail.com> escreveu --- > > > > +1 for move on :) > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025, 03:02 Romain Manni-Bucau < mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > sounds good to me > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau < https://x.com/rmannibucau > | .NET Blog > > < https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/ > | Blog < https://rmannibucau.github.io/ > > > > > | Old > > Blog < http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > | Github > > < https://github.com/rmannibucau > | LinkedIn > > < https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > | Book > > < > > https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064 > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 21:36, Paulo Araújo < > > mailto:cris...@vikeo.com.br.invalid > > > a > > écrit : > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > Could we start the work to evolve openjpa to JPA 3.2? > > > > > > I've made some changes in my branch to push minimum JDK version to 17. > > > > > > For now, it is just some bumps in dependencies versions of the project, > > > some cleanups in violations of checkstyle and removal of deprecated > > methods > > > (mostly on the SecurityManager front). The build still works, but it > > > touches a big chunk of files and the revision would be a nightmare, I > > guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was planning to submit this startup work as a tentative 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT > > > version and keep working on the features added in spec (a lot more than > > > 3.0-to-3.1). > > > > > > What do you think about it? > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Paulo > > -- Best regards, Maxim
