Hi Ivan, Ok for the sample but the main goal of my post was a suggestion to display correctly the cluster on a map.
I think that the sample is not a correct representation of the reality. The addition of a function that get the max value present permit to display correctly the cluster and have a radius that correspond to the reality. In the sample formula, if you have a cluster that aggregate 100 features and an other that aggregate 20 feature they will be displayed with the same radius. With my function the radius will be correctly adapted and we have a correct representation of the reality Sincerly, Jérome Ivan Grcic-2 wrote: > > HI Jerome, > > Function Math.min(feature.attributes.count, 7) + 3 was just a sample > in the demo. You can use whatever function you need, just take care to > make it as simple as possible, because it runs trought it for every > feature in cluster. > > Cheers, Ivan > -- > Ivan Grcic > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-cluster-strategy-tp20701364p20702430.html Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
