On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 07:38 +0200, Eric Lemoine wrote: > > I'd be +1 on using x.y for both types of releases. Choosing to do a > "big" or "small" release could be done based on a number of things: > disruptive patches were included? no big release for too long? etc.
I've always said that version numbers are cheap. I'm +1 on this and +1 on streamlining the release process (e.g. dropping the RC phase if the release manager deems it unnecessary) to make it easier to get stuff out. I think there's a good compromise between "release early and often" and keeping OpenLayers a reliable resource for the community. SDE _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
