the issue is the refactored method:
<handler name="onselect">
            parent.attachCamera();
        </handler>
and "attachCamera".


The effect of this onselect handler is that, even when you simply open up
this dialog, the
"onselect" handler will be executed, cause the combobox will do a default
selection.
And by doing that it will run the method attachCamera

Actually I don't understand the flow of this re-factoring at all.

Why should the method "attachCamera" be executed upon every time a user
select a different item in this combobox ?

Actually it should only be executed when the user hits the "start
conference" button (or when the 5 second test recording is started).

What is the purpose of the refactored code ?

Sebastian




2013/3/15 seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com>

> Sorry but there is a blocker.
> When you enter the room type "conference room", the device settings popup
> does no more pop up.
> And re-starting the device settings has no effect.
> So you can't share audio/video at all.
>
> And if you start the application using the debug URL, it pops up, but it
> tries to access the cam even _before_ you hit "start conference" ... which
> is also wrong.
>
> I can see some:
> ERROR @video/editRecordStreamSWF10.lzx≈512: TypeError: Error #1010
>
> In the Debug window of the AS3 code (right hand). The effect in AS3 is
> that all script after this error is never executed (and the error will be
> shown only the first time, the second, third, ... times it won't show the
> error and just not silently stop working.
>
> This issue needs further investigation. But it definitly is not possible
> to release it like that. However it might be just a minor glitch that is
> easy to repair.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/3/15 "Ирина Архипец" <ia...@unipro.ru>
>
>> +1
>>
>> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>> >
>> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0
>> RC2
>> >
>> > RC1 has multiple negative votes:
>> >
>> > - [OPENMEETINGS-552] [OPENMEETINGS-561] [OPENMEETINGS-563] - issues were
>> > filed
>> >
>> > - Release notes and documentation was incomplete
>> >
>> > - RC1 performance and stability was not tested enough
>> >
>> >
>> > Main changes are covered in the
>> > Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC2/README
>> >
>> > Full
>> > Changelog:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC2/CHANGELOG
>> >
>> > Release
>> > artefacts:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc2/
>> >
>> > Tag:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC2/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using C467526E):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc2/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > My vote is +1.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com

Reply via email to